- causal_pipeline: SMARM_CAUSAL_AUDIT=1 appends render_ledger_audit()
after the summary; pinned summary format untouched.
- causal_attrib_probe: per-pct audit line (absorbed/forgiven/drops/
discards) under the existing eff line, so in-site-vs-attributed and
the loss buckets land in one place for the sweep.
1-core smoke (work + wide): books balance — absorbed = 2x injected and
forgiven = 2x injected, i.e. owed = injected x (N-1) with N=5 actors,
zero outstanding. drop park = 0 even in wide mode (the bottleneck's
queue is never empty, so its in-guard recv never parks); drop yield is
~1500 events but ~0.1ms per window, confirming slice-expiry yields
sample at their own checkpoint. Deficit decomposition needs the
parallel box.
Samples were taken only when maybe_preempt's cold block happened to fire
in-site, so the interval between the last check and SiteGuard drop was
discarded on every site entry. Measured live on the 24-core box:
22-29us lost per entry, a constant attribution efficiency of ~0.93-0.94,
which under-reported every impact (+83.5% where theory says +100%; the
observed shortfall fits 1/(1-pct*eff)-1 at both 25% and 50%).
SiteGuard enter/drop now call site_transition(): leaving the target site
flushes the pending interval into the ledger (sample-only, never spins,
so safe under no-preempt regions); entering the target site re-arms the
sample clock so pre-site time is never attributed (the symmetric
over-attribution). Winner attribution is factored into attribute(),
shared by the cold check and the flush, with the same interval clamps.
Adds examples/causal_attrib_probe.rs (ground-truth in-site time vs
ledger attribution, the probe that confirmed the leak) and the
site_boundaries_flush_tail regression test (a site entry that never
hits a cold check must still be attributed). Also gates causal_probe
on smarm-causal in Cargo.toml - it never was, so featureless builds
of the examples were broken.
Claude (sandbox)