Files
smarm/examples/statem_switch.rs
T
smarm-agent acc37c5fc9 RFC 017 chunk 1: gen_statem primitives (no macro yet)
Runtime support layer for gen_statem, built against existing public API
(channel + scheduler::spawn), sibling to gen_server. No macro: per review,
build the primitives first and hand-write the Switch example to evaluate
whether a statem! macro earns its place before committing to one.

- src/statem.rs: Machine trait (on_start/handle), Resolution<S> with
  From<S>, Cx (on_unhandled), Reply<T> move-only reply handle, StatemRef
  (send/call), spawn + inbox loop. Real time only; Postpone + Cx timeout
  arming are in the type surface but not yet acted on (chunks 2-3).
- examples/statem_switch.rs: the RFC Switch machine hand-written against the
  primitives, tagged USER vs MACRO to mark what a macro would generate.
  Asserts the RFC end-state (flips=1, enters=3).
- tests/statem.rs: call/cast round-trip, enter-on-start/transition-not-stay,
  panicking-handler -> Down.

Reply<T> included (the call helper needs a handle type; keeps the example
true to the RFC surface) but isolated and trivially removable if we drop it.
2026-06-19 19:52:02 +00:00

153 lines
5.6 KiB
Rust
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
//! A hand-written `gen_statem`, written directly against the chunk-1 primitives
//! in `smarm::statem` — no macro. This is the RFC 017 `Switch` example, and its
//! purpose is to be the **evaluation artifact**: it shows exactly the shape the
//! deferred `statem!` macro would have to generate, so we can judge what the
//! macro actually buys before committing to building one.
//!
//! Run with: `cargo run --example statem_switch`
//!
//! Sections are tagged // USER (you'd hand-write this with or without a macro)
//! and // MACRO (the boilerplate a `statem!` would emit for you).
use smarm::run;
use smarm::statem::{self, Cx, Machine, Reply, Resolution, StatemRef};
// ---- USER: the four hand-written types ------------------------------------
// In the macro world these are unchanged — the macro never generates them.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
enum Switch {
Off,
On,
}
struct Counts {
flips: u32,
enters: u32,
}
enum SwitchCast {
Flip,
}
enum SwitchCall {
GetCount(Reply<u32>),
GetEnters(Reply<u32>),
}
// ---- MACRO: the unified event ---------------------------------------------
// The user's two message enums folded together. Chunk 1 has no internal
// variants yet; chunks 23 add `StateTimeout` / `Timeout(name)` here.
enum Ev {
Cast(SwitchCast),
Call(SwitchCall),
}
// ---- MACRO: the machine struct + state cell -------------------------------
// `state` is the private cell; the `handle` body below is its sole writer.
struct SwitchSm {
state: Switch,
data: Counts,
}
impl SwitchSm {
// MACRO: `Switch::start` in the RFC; spawns the actor, hands back a ref.
fn start(init: Switch, data: Counts) -> StatemRef<SwitchSm> {
statem::spawn(SwitchSm { state: init, data })
}
// MACRO: the `enter` dispatch, assembled from the per-state `enter` arms.
// USER wrote the arm bodies (`data.enters += 1`); the macro wrote the match
// and the `()` return. `enter` runs side effects only — it cannot transition.
fn enter(&mut self, s: Switch, _cx: &mut Cx<Ev>) {
match s {
Switch::Off => self.data.enters += 1,
Switch::On => self.data.enters += 1,
}
}
}
impl Machine for SwitchSm {
type Ev = Ev;
// MACRO: run the initial state's enter.
fn on_start(&mut self, cx: &mut Cx<Ev>) {
let s = self.state;
self.enter(s, cx);
}
fn handle(&mut self, ev: Ev, cx: &mut Cx<Ev>) {
let prev = self.state;
// MACRO: the `(state, event)` dispatch table. USER wrote each arm tail
// (the body + the ending state tag); the macro qualified bare tags
// (`On` -> `Switch::On`), wrapped them in `.into()`, assembled the match,
// and — in the real macro — would have edge-checked each tail tag
// against the `transitions { Off => On, On => Off }` table at expand
// time. Here that check is on the honour system.
let next: Resolution<Switch> = match (self.state, ev) {
(Switch::Off, Ev::Cast(SwitchCast::Flip)) => {
self.data.flips += 1;
Switch::On.into()
}
(Switch::On, Ev::Cast(SwitchCast::Flip)) => Switch::Off.into(),
(Switch::Off, Ev::Call(SwitchCall::GetCount(r))) => {
r.reply(self.data.flips);
Switch::Off.into() // stay = return the current tag
}
(Switch::On, Ev::Call(SwitchCall::GetCount(r))) => {
r.reply(self.data.flips);
Switch::On.into()
}
(Switch::Off, Ev::Call(SwitchCall::GetEnters(r))) => {
r.reply(self.data.enters);
Switch::Off.into()
}
(Switch::On, Ev::Call(SwitchCall::GetEnters(r))) => {
r.reply(self.data.enters);
Switch::On.into()
}
// The macro would emit `_ => Resolution::Unhandled` here for a
// machine whose table is non-exhaustive; this one covers every
// (state, event) pair, so an added arm would be unreachable.
};
// MACRO: the resolution dispatch — identical in every generated machine.
match next {
Resolution::To(s) if s == prev => {} // stay: no enter, no reset
Resolution::To(s) => {
self.state = s; // <- sole writer of the state cell
// chunk 2: self.timers.clear_state_timeout();
self.enter(s, cx);
// chunk 3: cx.replay(&mut self.postponed);
}
Resolution::Postpone => {} // chunk 3
Resolution::Unhandled => cx.on_unhandled(),
}
}
}
fn main() {
run(|| {
// USER: the client side. With a macro these would be `sw.cast(..)` /
// `sw.call(SwitchCall::GetCount)`; without it, the `Ev::Cast` / `Ev::Call`
// wrap is explicit — note how mechanical it is.
let sw = SwitchSm::start(Switch::Off, Counts { flips: 0, enters: 0 });
sw.send(Ev::Cast(SwitchCast::Flip)).unwrap(); // Off -> On
sw.send(Ev::Cast(SwitchCast::Flip)).unwrap(); // On -> Off
let flips = sw.call(|r| Ev::Call(SwitchCall::GetCount(r))).unwrap();
let enters = sw.call(|r| Ev::Call(SwitchCall::GetEnters(r))).unwrap();
// RFC's stated end state after two flips: Counts { flips: 1, enters: 3 }
// (initial Off entry + On entry + Off entry).
println!("after two flips: flips={flips}, enters={enters}");
assert_eq!(flips, 1, "turned On once across the two flips");
assert_eq!(enters, 3, "initial Off + On + Off entries");
println!("ok");
});
}